Showing posts with label politics. Show all posts
Showing posts with label politics. Show all posts

Why Your Wild Trading Ideas Feel So Right

No comments

Friday, February 19, 2021

 

For investors, that ‘gut feeling’ can be more powerful than they realize. Here’s how to listen to your gut without being ruled by it

ILLUSTRATION: ALEX NABAUM
  • SAVE
  • PRINT
  • TEXT
  • 41
Listen to this article
6 minutes
00:00 / 05:45
1x

If only financial markets came with traffic signals: indisputable indicators of when it is safe to keep going, when you need to slow down, when you must stop. Imagine how much easier investing would be if you could rely on such green, yellow or red lights.

Unfortunately, these unambiguous signals don’t exist. Investors fill much of the absence with anecdotes and gut feelings, which can be more powerful than you realize. Such soft indicators can help you make hard decisions, but only if you rely on them in the right ways.

Consider the anecdotal feel of today’s markets.

Bitcoin’s price rose above $50,000 this week. Dogecoin, a digital currency intended as a joke, is up more than 1,000% in 2021. Margin debt, borrowed money that brokerage customers use to juice their trading, is up 42% from a year ago, according to the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority. For the week ending Feb. 12, bullish options bets by small traders ran at a near-record 16 times the average for the past two decades, calculates Jason Goepfert of Sundial Capital Research, a Minneapolis firm that tracks market sentiment.

On the other hand, the Federal Reserve expects to keep firehosing money into the economy and to hold interest rates near zero for the foreseeable future. That pushes the return on safe assets so low that they feel worthless to hold, shoving investors into riskier choices. Vaccines are reaching millions of people, and new coronavirus cases are falling fast, fueling hopes for a quicker and stronger economic recovery.

Those are two opposing narratives. Depending on which feels more compelling, your gut may be telling you to be cravenly bearish or gung-ho bullish.

And you wouldn’t be alone in heeding your gut feelings.

The late Jack Welch, former chief executive of General Electric Co., and the late Chrysler Corp. CEO Lee Iacocca often justified decisions by saying they were guided by their gut.

Robert Soros, son of hedge-fund titan George Soros, once remarked: “The reason [my father] changes his position on the market or whatever is because his back starts killing him. It has nothing to do with reason. He literally goes into a spasm, and it’s this early warning sign.”

So, gut feelings don’t arise only from your gastrointestinal tract. Evolution finely tuned our bodies to potential changes in risk and reward, preparing our ancestors for fight or flight in the presence of prey or predators.

SHARE YOUR THOUGHTS

How much credence do you give to your “gut” when you invest? Join the conversation below.

In today’s world, the same mechanisms make our hearts race, palms sweat and muscles tense up when we expect our portfolios to take a sharp rise or fall.

“What we’re really talking about [with] gut feelings is how people sense their internal milieu, which encompasses a multitude of different signals, coming from all over the place within the body,” says Sahib Khalsa, a neuroscientist at the Laureate Institute for Brain Research in Tulsa, Okla. “The brain is constantly sampling and receiving all these signals, even if you’re not consciously aware of that.”

A recent experiment in Prof. Khalsa’s lab found that such signals from the stomach activate regions of the brain that monitor arousal and motivate people to orient their attention. Such gut feelings—which scientists call interoception—can shape our decisions even when we believe we are relying on data and logic.

These intuitions are most reliable when they arise in stable environments where you get prompt, accurate and unambiguous feedback.

Veteran athletes, for example, can “feel” what will happen next because they have vast experience on playing fields where the laws of physics don’t waver. That’s what Robin Hogarth, a psychologist at Universitat Pompeu Fabra in Barcelona, calls a “kind” learning environment.

Financial markets, however, offer what he calls a “wicked” feedback structure. You buy a stock at $10. It immediately goes to $11 as a famous investor discloses she bought it. You were right! Then it sags to $9, and another noted investor says he dumped it. Now you’re wrong!

With such erratic feedback, it’s hard to educate your intuitions as professional athletes and other skilled performers do in stable environments. But your gut feelings will still feel powerful—precisely because the information you’re getting is in such flux.

That’s especially true at a time like this, when most financial assets are overvalued by traditional measures and when nightmare and nirvana scenarios are both plausible.

The solution is to adopt rules and procedures that enable you to listen to your gut without being ruled by it.

Don’t just heave a hunk of money at (say) bitcoin because it’s “going to the moon.” Write down how likely, in a percentage range, you think it is to reach your target price by a certain date. List, in as much factual detail as you can, three reasons why. (If all you’re going on is a hunch, then write something like “I have a gut feeling” three times.) Finally, use your estimate of the probability you are right to determine how much you invest.

When the target date arrives, check the outcome against your original forecast and reasoning and see if what you wrote down at the start can teach you anything about how to make your next investment. Did the asset end up near your predicted price roughly when you expected? How much of your rationale was right? If all you went on was intuition, did it turn out to be reliable?

A gut check just might keep your gut from hijacking your brain.

U.N. Report Accuses Blackwater Founder Erik Prince of Libya Weapons Ban Violations, Diplomat Says

No comments

 

Mr. Prince likely to be referred to the U.N.’s Sanctions Committee, which could order a freeze on his assets or a travel ban

Blackwater founder Erik Prince in 2017.

PHOTO: JACQUELYN MARTIN/ASSOCIATED PRESS
  • SAVE
  • PRINT
  • TEXT
Listen to this article
6 minutes
00:00 / 06:24
1x

DUBAI—A United Nations report accuses Blackwater founder Erik Prince of assisting in violations of an international arms embargo on Libya, placing the military contractor at risk of U.N. sanctions, according to a diplomat with access to the report.

The report by the U.N. Panel of Experts that monitors the ban on transfers of weapons to Libya says companies controlled by Mr. Prince provided three aircraft to assist in sending helicopters and military contractors to help Russian-backed Libyan warlord Khalifa Haftar in 2019.

The plan to send Western mercenaries to Libya developed as foreign weapons and fighters poured into the country in 2019 and 2020 from a variety of outside powers, including Russia, Turkey and the United Arab Emirates, deepening a conflict that has been ongoing since 2014, the report says, according to the diplomat.

Mr. Prince is likely to be referred to the U.N.’s Sanctions Committee, which could order a freeze on his assets or a travel ban, according to the New York-based diplomat and a former official with knowledge of the situation. The permanent members of the Security Council, including the U.S., Russia, or China, could veto any potential sanctions against Mr. Prince, who has had dealings with all three countries.

“Erik Prince had absolutely nothing to do with any operation in Libya in 2019, or at any other time,” a spokesman for Mr. Prince said in an email.

A U.N. spokesman said the organization had no specific comment on the Panel of Experts report.

“It is incumbent on our member states to ensure that the sanctions are respected and enforced,” said U.N. spokesman Stephane Dujarric De La Rivière.

The report itself has been finalized and submitted to the U.N.’s headquarters in New York. It is unlikely to be altered before it is released to the public in the coming weeks, according to diplomats.

Mr. Prince, a former Navy SEAL, came to prominence during the Iraq war, when Blackwater provided private security guards to U.S. officials and contractors working for the company shot dead more than a dozen Iraqi civilians in a 2007 mass killing in Baghdad. Blackwater has since changed its name to Xe Services and later Academi.

Mr. Prince’s financial and political ambitions rose because of his close relationship to the Trump administration. Mr. Prince is the brother of Mr. Trump’s former education secretary, Betsy DeVos. In December, Mr. Trump pardoned the four Blackwater guards accused in the 2007 killings.

According to the diplomat, the forthcoming U.N. report says companies controlled by Mr. Prince sold three aircraft to people who sent Western mercenaries and military hardware to aid Mr. Haftar in the opening months of the commander’s failed assault on Libya’s internationally recognized government in Tripoli. Launched in April 2019, Mr. Haftar’s attack on the capital plunged Libya into its worst fighting since the armed rebellion that overthrew Col. Moammar Gadhafi in 2011.

According to the diplomat, the U.N. panel’s report says that firms controlled by Mr. Prince sold three aircraft through a series of shell companies to a Dubai-based company, Lancaster 6, which sent helicopters and a group of Western mercenaries to Libya to support Mr. Haftar. The plan unraveled, and the fighters left Libya.

A member of the Libyan National Army commanded by Khalifa Haftar at a site west of Sirte, Libya, controlled by the warlord last August.

PHOTO: ESAM OMRAN AL-FETORI/REUTERS

One of the planes, a Pilatus PC-6, was delivered to Libya for use in reconnaissance and intelligence operations for Mr. Haftar’s forces, according to the diplomat with access to the report. A U.S. company, TST Humanitarian Surveys, controlled by Mr. Prince through a U.S.-based attorney, sold the plane to another company in Austria partly owned by Mr. Prince, which then sold it to Lancaster 6 in June 2019, the diplomat with access to the report said. The plane arrived in Libya days later, according to the diplomat.

The other two planes, including an Antonov An-26 cargo plane intended to transport helicopters, arrived in Jordan and didn’t fly to Libya, but were identified in the report as part of a broader plan to send military aid to Mr. Haftar.

The plan also involved several associates of Mr. Prince, according to the diplomat and the former official with knowledge of the situation. The operation was first reported last year by Bloomberg and the New York Times. Until now, U.N. investigators hadn’t directly accused Mr. Prince of being involved in the scheme.

Using funds from a Dubai-based company and a cover story involving a fake plan for a geospatial survey in Jordan, the team later obtained in South Africa three Aérospatiale Gazelle helicopters and three Super Puma helicopters. At least one of the helicopters was transported to Libya. The helicopters were purchased for a total of more than $13 million, a price well above their market value and one that suggested profit was a key motive behind the operation.

“This is basically a scheme where they wanted to make money around procurement of weapons,” said the former official with knowledge of the situation.

The role in the effort of companies based in Dubai also highlights Mr. Prince’s close ties to the United Arab Emirates and its ruler, Crown Prince Mohammed Bin Zayed. Mr. Prince has been linked to a range of mercenary efforts on behalf of the Emirates, including an effort to combat Somali pirates, according to a previous U.N. report. The U.A.E. also has been a key military backer of Mr. Haftar, sending air defenses, armed drones, ammunition and airplanes to support the militia leader’s campaigns, according to multiple U.N. reports. Mr. Prince visited Abu Dhabi in recent weeks, according to the diplomat.

The U.N. report, the diplomat said, also accuses Mr. Prince of violating a U.N. Security Council resolution by failing to provide information about the alleged violations of the arms embargo when contacted by the Panel of Experts.

In addition to naming Mr. Prince in the report, the U.N. Panel of Experts is also expected to separately refer Mr. Prince to the United Nations’ Sanctions Committee, which will make a decision about whether to impose an asset freeze or travel ban to be implemented by individual countries including the U.S., the diplomat said.

Don't Miss
© all rights reserved
made with by templateszoo